The Joke of Sisyphus
The Myth of Sisyphus by Albert Camus leaves us with the thesis that Sisyphus denies the gods and that his world is a world without a master. When this very Sisyphus tells us the ancient myth about himself once again, a comic twist occurs creating a joke that tells us: instead of people being toys in the hands of the gods, the gods themselves become toys in the hands of man.
The play The Joke of Sisyphus – a fake myth about gods and men – casually peers into the cracks of the commonplaces of Greek mythology and, in the style of Camus, asks us whether Sisyphus is the greatest trickster among mortals or merely an insolent figure who refuses to die. Is the eternal rolling of a boulder up a hill a just punishment or merely an egoistic god venting his anger? Are Camus’s metaphors about Sisyphus as a worker or about Sisyphus as Don Juan still exclusive, or can we also view Sisyphus, now as a joke-hero, as a macho-capitalist or a kitsch-lover?
The one-sidedness of the ancient myth, which defends the gods-men, diminishes the goddesses-women, and makes mortals-people meaningless heroes, and the many layers of Camus’s text revealed to us that there is still some meaning hidden in Sisyphus’ work, and that, besides imagining Sisyphus happy, we can also imagine him being sad.